Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!ukc!stc!root44!miduet!misoft!adam From: adam@gec-mi-at.co.uk (Adam Quantrill) Newsgroups: comp.ai,comp.cog-eng Subject: Re: The symbol grounding problem Message-ID: <605@gec-mi-at.co.uk> Date: Tue, 23-Jun-87 06:24:52 EDT Article-I.D.: gec-mi-a.605 Posted: Tue Jun 23 06:24:52 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 17:32:22 EDT References: <764@mind.UUCP> <768@mind.UUCP> <770@mind.UUCP> Sender: news@gec-mi-at.co.uk Reply-To: adam@gec-mi-at.co.uk (Adam Quantrill) Organization: Marconi Instruments Ltd., St. Albans, UK Lines: 27 Keywords: symbols, grounding, red, herring Summary: Symbol Grounding is a red herring. Xref: mnetor comp.ai:615 comp.cog-eng:183 In article <6521@diamond.BBN.COM> aweinste@Diamond.BBN.COM (Anders Weinstein) writes: > >To elaborate: I presume the "symbol-grounding" problem is a *philosophical* >question: what gives formal symbols original intentionality? I suppose the >only answer anybody knows is, in brief, that the symbols must be playing a >certain role in what Dennett calls an "intentional system", that is, a system >which is capable of producing complex, adaptive behavior in a rational way. >[] >And this, as far as I can tell, is the end of what we learn from the "symbol >grounding" problem -- you've got to have sense organs. [] It seems to me that the Symbol Grounding problem is a red herring. If I took a partially self-learning program and data (P & D) that had learnt from a computer with 'sense organs', and ran it on a computer without, would the program's output become symbolically ungrounded? Similarily, if I myself wrote P & D without running it on a computer at all, where's the difference? Surely it is possible that I can come up with identical P & D by analysis. Does that make the original P & D running on the com- puter with 'sense organs' symbolically ungrounded? A computer can always interact via the keyboard & terminal screen, (if those are the only 'sense organs'), grounding its internal symbols via people who react to the output, and provide further stimulus. -Adam. /* If at first it don't compile, kludge, kludge again.*/