Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!enea!mats From: mats@enea.UUCP (Mats Josefsson) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Need info on SYBASE(R) RDBMS Message-ID: <1977@enea.UUCP> Date: Tue, 9-Jun-87 10:09:34 EDT Article-I.D.: enea.1977 Posted: Tue Jun 9 10:09:34 1987 Date-Received: Fri, 12-Jun-87 04:00:43 EDT Reply-To: mats@enea.se (Mats Josefsson) Distribution: world Organization: ENEA DATA Svenska AB, Sweden Lines: 55 Keywords: SYBASE RDBMS I have some questions for people who are using an RDBMS product from Sybase Inc. (or anyone knowing the answers). First, some background: I'm evaluating RDBMS products to be used in a software development environment. The system should aid in development, production, support and maintenance of a large real-time software system. The database is to be used to keep track of all parts of the system, dependencies between parts, which parts has been delivered to whom etc. It should also be possible to see which delivered systems would be affected by a software change and so on. In addition to this we plan to support the administration of development and delivery projects as well as the internal organization of the company (Who's assigned to this project? Which projects are this guy assigned to?). The system should be able to support around 100 simultaneous users. We haven't decided on the hardware yet, but it will probably be a supermini in the 10 Mips (or 780 equvivalents) range. We estimate that the database will have about a hundred relations with a total of a few million tuples. The real-time system is about 5-10 GBytes of source and documentation. It's not necessary to keep the source and doc's in the database though. In the process of evaluating RDBMS systems I've come across the products DataWorkbench/DataToolset* from Sybase Inc. Since it is a fairly new product and the company has no representatives outside the U.S.A., I wonder if anyone reading this newsgroup could help me with some questions. 1. Is it really as good as the "glossy brochures" say? They claim for instance to go beyond Codd's 12 rules, supporting DBMS enforced integrity, backup and design changes on a "live" system, distributed data management etc. These features would save a lot of application development/maintenance time. 2. I need some references to people using the system, preferably for an application like ours, but any experiences would do. 3. How is performance (as compared to Oracle, Ingres or others)? They claim up to 9 TP1 transactions/second on a Sun 3/160. I don't know how this relates to the competition (Oracle, Ingres). 4. How good is the user interface and the application building tools. They lack an ESQL interface, but claim that their solution with a programming language interface is better. * DataWorkbench and DataToolset are trademarks of Sybase Inc. Thanks in advance, -- Mats Josefsson, ENEA DATA, Sweden UUCP: {seismo,mcvax,munnari,cernvax,diku,inria,prlb2,penet,ukc,unido}!enea!mats Internet: mats@enea.se