Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!mcvax!cernvax!cgcha!whwb From: whwb@cgcha.UUCP (Hans W. Barz) Newsgroups: comp.databases Subject: Re: Database Machines Message-ID: <387@cgcha.UUCP> Date: Thu, 25-Jun-87 03:39:50 EDT Article-I.D.: cgcha.387 Posted: Thu Jun 25 03:39:50 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 20:50:54 EDT References: <2700@blia.BLI.COM> <851@rtech.UUCP> <2042@utah-gr.UUCP> <2891@zen.berkeley.edu> Organization: CIBA-GEIGY AG, FO/WIRZ/WRZ, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland Lines: 33 Summary: Differences of Database Machines, Performance Issues of Distributed Databases In article <2891@zen.berkeley.edu>, larry@ingres.Berkeley.EDU (Larry Rowe) writes: > Several comments on the recent discussion of ``database machines.'' > > THE OTHER LINES HAVE BEEN REMOVED FOR READABILITY OF THIS NEWS Usually I do not add news in this group, since I have the impression that most of the partipicants are working only with small databases -- i.e. < 300 MB Some comments in a recent news on database machines -- see above -- did make me to write these lines since these databases are usefull for bigger applications: 1) The Teradata system -- name origins from TERABYTE -- is no competitive system to the Britton-Lee. The performance and price range is much above. 2) Distributed Database systems have usually a worse performance compared to non distributed systems. The only chance for a distributed database to gain performance is by partitioning a single job or query to multiple processors. This is only works currently for the Teradata. 3) The Teradata is not really a distributed database, since the communication in the Y-NET is synchronously while different processors are working asynchronously on the data -- this concept is not trivial and I cannot explain it completely in some lines. 4) I have done benchmarks on Teradata, DB2(3090), Britton-Lee(IDM) and Tandem-SQL. It is rather difficult to summarize that, but Teradata has the best price/ performance rate and delivers usually the best performance for the four above machines. H.W.Barz, WRZ, CIBA-GEIGY, CH