Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron
From: ron@topaz.rutgers.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: $$$$$$$
Message-ID: <13004@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: Mon, 29-Jun-87 11:25:41 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.13004
Posted: Mon Jun 29 11:25:41 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 30-Jun-87 04:18:30 EDT
References: <10576@decwrl.DEC.COM>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 12

Well, if you implement this the in the spirit of the original intent,
it would probably mean some savings to telenet.  As part of the access
charge, the phone company would provide service between the exchanges
and the network point of presence.  I have to believe that this would
mean a reduction for TELENET, which has to have numbers that are a local
call to most of its subscribers.  Also, the number called from info would
certainly be useful to these data carriers if it were available.

Unfortunately, this bill makes little sense for the DATA over VOICE
system scenario rather than an integrated network.

-Ron