Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!cuae2!ltuxa!ttrdc!levy
From: levy@ttrdc.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Another portable code question
Message-ID: <1763@ttrdc.UUCP>
Date: Mon, 15-Jun-87 01:57:46 EDT
Article-I.D.: ttrdc.1763
Posted: Mon Jun 15 01:57:46 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 16-Jun-87 01:38:57 EDT
References: <16673@cca.CCA.COM>
Organization: AT&T, Skokie, IL
Lines: 25

In article <16673@cca.CCA.COM>, g-rh@cca.CCA.COM (Richard Harter) writes:
< extern int (*command_table[])();
< .....
< command_processor() {
< ....
< int (*command)();
< ....
< command = command_table[n];
< ....
< (*command)(args);
< ....
< }
< 
< One vendor's compiler (I won't name it because I don't have the
< log sheets at hand) gives a compilation warning for (*command)().
< (This is a UNIX box.)

I'm curious what the warning is.  Could the compiler be griping because
you do nothing with the return value from (*command)(args) ?  (Lint should
complain about this too.)
-- 
|------------dan levy------------|  Path: ..!{akgua,homxb,ihnp4,ltuxa,mvuxa,
|         an engihacker @        |		vax135}!ttrdc!ttrda!levy
|    at&t data systems division  |  Disclaimer:  try datclaimer.
|--------skokie, illinois--------|