Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!ron
From: ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Writing readable code
Message-ID: <13148@topaz.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 4-Jul-87 16:33:52 EDT
Article-I.D.: topaz.13148
Posted: Sat Jul  4 16:33:52 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 20:44:53 EDT
References: <1158@copper.TEK.COM> <6858@auspyr.UUCP> <17171@cca.CCA.COM> <13008@topaz.rutgers.edu> <926@argus.UUCP> <1681@kontron.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 6

Microsoft C (if it really requires NULL to be 0L) is broken by all
standards that C compilers have ever been designed to.  K&R explicitly
defined 0 comparisons to pointers to be the rule and no one since has
come up with any convincing arguments to the contrary.

-Ron