Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!amdahl!drivax!socha From: socha@drivax.UUCP Newsgroups: talk.bizarre,comp.misc Subject: Re: What the world needs now Message-ID: <1827@drivax.UUCP> Date: Thu, 11-Jun-87 14:59:22 EDT Article-I.D.: drivax.1827 Posted: Thu Jun 11 14:59:22 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jun-87 23:47:43 EDT References: <1240@ssc-vax.UUCP> <631@mapper.UUCP> <3268@bigburd.PRC.Unisys.COM> Reply-To: socha@drivax.UUCP (Henri J. Socha (x6251)) Followup-To: talk.bizarre Organization: Digital Research, Monterey Lines: 27 Keywords: It's so simple to program a computer to explode Xref: utgpu talk.bizarre:2031 comp.misc:620 Summary: APL in the big apple The following story was related to me by employees of I.P. Sharp Associates (IPS). They, with Scientific Time Sharing Corp. (STSC) wrote APL for IBM back in the early days. It seems that there started to be competitors to IPS/STSC's APL system. These companies would usually use IBMs APL (written by IPS/STSC) on their large IBM mainframes. Sometimes they would add extra bulletproofing so that APL would not bomb, get better performance, etc. Now, IPS/STSC really knew APL (and the IBM implementation) very well. In fact, an employee living in Palo Alto would debug/enhance the production on-line APL system from his home! There were people across North America and in Europe (at that time) using this single mainframe (360/158 I think). The computer was in Toronto Canada. Anyway, a competitor named Manhattan APL (I think) called up IPS and said they were about to come online and if IPS wanted to, they could test the system. Manhattan said they had filled in all the holes and the system was unbreakable. Manhattan APL came online for their customers about 2 months late. It seems that some of their disk drives had thrashed themselves to death. -- UUCP:...!amdahl!drivax!socha WAT Iron'75 "Everything should be made as simple as possible but not simpler." A. Einstein