Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!noah.arc.CDN!kenw
From: kenw@noah.arc.CDN.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: CONIX v/xs ZCPR
Message-ID: <176*kenw@noah.arc.cdn>
Date: Thu, 4-Jun-87 12:17:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: noah.176*kenw
Posted: Thu Jun  4 12:17:07 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 08:12:50 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 17


   For about the last year I've been drooling over the ads for CONIX, the
super-duper CP/M replacement. It got good reviews, and looks better than ZCPR3
in many ways. I use ZCPR2 now, but a lot of that stuff is only really useful
for hard drives and multiple users (I run dual 8" DSDD floppies and a RAM
disk). 

  However, there seems to be a lot of fuss and bother over ZCPR3, but not a 
peep about CONIX. How come? Doesn't *anybody* use it? I would really like to 
see some discussion.

  For that matter, has anybody tried out that PD BDOS replacement I read 
about recently (can't remember who by)?
/kenw
								  A L B E R T A
Ken Wallewein							R E S E A R C H
								  C O U N C I L