Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!tikal!sigma!bill
From: bill@sigma.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm
Subject: Re: CONIX v/xs ZCPR
Message-ID: <1239@sigma.UUCP>
Date: Fri, 5-Jun-87 11:41:48 EDT
Article-I.D.: sigma.1239
Posted: Fri Jun  5 11:41:48 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 7-Jun-87 00:39:07 EDT
References: <176*kenw@noah.arc.cdn>
Reply-To: bill@sigma.UUCP (WIlliam Swan)
Distribution: world
Organization: Summation Inc, Kirkland WA
Lines: 18

In article <176*kenw@noah.arc.cdn> kenw@noah.arc.CDN (Ken Wallewein) writes:
>[...]However, there seems to be a lot of fuss and bother over ZCPR3, but not a 
>peep about CONIX. How come? Doesn't *anybody* use it? I would really like to 
>see some discussion.
>
>  For that matter, has anybody tried out that PD BDOS replacement I read 
>about recently (can't remember who by)?

Ken,

I don't think anybody on the net is running CONIX. I posted a request for
info a year or so ago.. nothing. I've seen one or two other requests, same
result.

Ditto for the BDOS replacement (it's on my list to do - but way down it).

-- 
William Swan  {ihnp4,decvax,allegra,...}!uw-beaver!tikal!sigma!bill