Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!CRUXNMC.BITNET!POSTMASTER From: POSTMASTER@CRUXNMC.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: (none) Message-ID: <8706280524.AA14632@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Sun, 28-Jun-87 01:24:58 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8706280524.AA14632 Posted: Sun Jun 28 01:24:58 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 28-Jun-87 08:36:01 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 55 From CRUXNMC.bitnet!POSTMASTER Wed Jun 24 21:38:58 1987 remote from mcvax Received: by mcvax.cwi.nl; Wed, 24 Jun 87 21:38:58 +0200 (MET) From: mcvax!CRUXNMC.bitnet!POSTMASTER Received: from mint.cern (mint) by cernvax.UUCP (4.12/4.7) id AA13762; Wed, 24 Jun 87 18:16:56 +0200 Received: by mint.cern (cernvax) (4.12/3.14) id AA11480; Wed, 24 Jun 87 18:15:04 +0200 Message-Id: <8706241615.AA11480@mint.cern> Received: by cernvax Wed Jun 24 18:14:57 from POSTMAST@CRUXNMC.BITNET for info-vax@cernvax via rscs. X-Bitnet-Sender: General Delivery Date: Wed, 24 Jun 87 17:21 N Original_From: Jnet%"AC02@NTSUVAX" Comments: This is gatewayed mail. Warning: Mail may not necessarily be returnable through this path. Subject: Jnet problems To: sri-kl.arpa!info-vax Received: From CEARN(MAILER) by CRUXNMC with RSCS id 7415 for RSC@CRUXNMC; Wed, 24 Jun 87 17:21 N Received: by CEARN (Mailer X1.24) id 7405; Wed, 24 Jun 87 17:22:32 GVA Date: Wed, 24 Jun 87 09:51 CST Reply-To: AC02@NTSUVAX Sender: Info Vax From: AC02@NTSUVAX Subject: Jnet problems Comments: To: To: ROBERT SCHUMACHER People on my system have been having several problems with JNET, but one of them stands out. The inability of JNET to receive binary files correctly (I know that VMSDUMP works between VAXes). The problem was originally noticed when a user on CMS (which runs on a IBM370 clone) sent a binary file to another user on the VAX. The file was a program for an IBM-PC. When the guy downloaded it from the VAX, it didn't work. I looked at the problem and finally traced it down to the JNET receive A good way to simulate the problem is to do a SEND/FILE/BINARY BLAH.EXE to yourself. Then go into RECEIVE and do a RECEIVE/BINARY BLAH.EXE. If you do a DIR/FULL on the original, it is a Fixed block file. The RECEIVEd version is Variable length, Carriage control. Does anybody have a solution (or a program) of how to get this to work right? I started to write a program to convert the RECEIVEd version back into the original back can't get it to work right. Thanks, Billy Barron Bitnet Address: BILLY@NTSUVAX or AC02@NTSUVAX VAX operator/programmer North Texas State Univ. "Opinions expressed are those on my employer unless someone happens to disagree with them."