Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!genrad!decvax!ucbvax!CRUXNMC.BITNET!WBR From: WBR@CRUXNMC.BITNET Newsgroups: comp.os.vms Subject: (none) Message-ID: <8707030039.AA07312@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Thu, 2-Jul-87 20:39:41 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8707030039.AA07312 Posted: Thu Jul 2 20:39:41 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 08:50:51 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 106 From CRUXNMC.bitnet!WBR Wed Jul 1 16:37:14 1987 remote from mcvax Received: by mcvax.cwi.nl; Wed, 1 Jul 87 16:37:14 +0200 (MET) From: mcvax!CRUXNMC.bitnet!WBR Received: from mint.cern (mint) by cernvax.UUCP (4.12/4.7) id AA20516; Wed, 1 Jul 87 16:23:34 +0200 Received: by mint.cern (cernvax) (4.12/3.14) id AA26592; Wed, 1 Jul 87 16:21:49 +0200 Message-Id: <8707011421.AA26592@mint.cern> Received: by cernvax Wed Jul 1 16:21:42 from WBR@CRUXNMC.BITNET for info-vax@cernvax via rscs. X-Bitnet-Sender: Walter Brueckner at CERN Date: Wed, 1 Jul 87 16:20 N Subject: STOP SENDING MAIL To: sri-kl.arpa!info-vax From: POSTMASTER 1-JUL-1987 15:38 To: POSTMASTER Subj: Returned Network Mail Your mail is being returned to you. Reason for return is: %E-NOSUCHUSR, no such user WISCVM.W at node UXNMC %E-ACTIMAGE, error activating image DUB1:[SYS0.][SYSLIB]BITNET_MAILSHR.EXE; %E-FNF, file not found Returned mail follows: ------------------------------ Received: From HUSC6(BSMTP) by CRUXNMC with RSCS id 2140 for WISCVM.W@CRUXNMC; Wed, 1 Jul 87 15:38 N Received: by talcott.harvard.edu; Wed, 1 Jul 87 05:22:59 EDT Received: by primerd.prime.com (3.2/SMI-3.0DEV3/smail) id AA01730; Wed, 1 Jul 87 04:01:18 EDT Message-Id: <8707010801.AA01730@primerd.prime.com> Received: from ENX.Prime.PDN by ENX.Prime.PDN; 01 Jul 87 02:43:41 EST Date: 01 Jul 87 02:43:35 EST From: primerd!MAILER-DAEMON%ENX.Prime.PDN@husc6.BITNET (transport version 1.5) Subject: returned mail; 550 Cannot write to mailbox; user not known To: mit-eddie!@EDDIE.MIT.EDU, @KL.SRI.Com, @wiscvm.wisc.edu,@primerd.prime.com:POSTMASTER@CRUXNMC.bitnet unsent message follows: From mit-eddie!@EDDIE.MIT.EDU,@KL.SRI.Com:@wiscvm.wisc.edu:POSTMASTER@CRUXNMC.b tnet Wed Jul 1 02:34:18 1987 Received: by primerd.prime.com (3.2/SMI-3.0DEV3/smail) id AA01422; Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:34:18 EDT Received: by EDDIE.MIT.EDU with sendmail-5.31/4.7 id ; Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:10:03 EDT From: @EDDIE.MIT.EDU@EDDIE.MIT.EDU, @EDDIE.MIT.EDU, @KL.SRI.Com,@wiscvm.wisc.edu:POSTMASTER@CRUXNMC.bitnet Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA11828; Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:11:42 EDT Received: by THESEUS.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA21385; Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:11:29 EDT Received: by ATHENA.MIT.EDU (5.45/4.7) id AA11816; Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:11:18 EDT Date: Wed, 1 Jul 87 02:11:18 EDT Message-Id: <8707010611.AA11816@ATHENA.MIT.EDU> Received: from wiscvm.wisc.edu by KL.SRI.COM with TCP; Tue 30 Jun 87 01:17:19-P T Received: from PSUVAX1.BITNET by wiscvm.wisc.edu ; Tue, 30 Jun 87 03:15:32 CDT To: To: martillo@enr.prime.com From CRUXNMC.bitnet!POSTMASTER Mon Jun 29 21:12:47 1987 remote from mcvax Received: by mcvax.cwi.nl; Mon, 29 Jun 87 21:12:47 +0200 (MET) From: mcvax!CRUXNMC.bitnet!POSTMASTER Received: from mint.cern (mint) by cernvax.UUCP (4.12/4.7) id AA01967; Fri, 26 Jun 87 18:57:52 +0200 Received: by mint.cern (cernvax) (4.12/3.14) id AA26660; Fri, 26 Jun 87 18:56:08 +0200 Message-Id: <8706261656.AA26660@mint.cern> Received: by cernvax Fri Jun 26 18:56:01 from POSTMAST@CRUXNMC.BITNET for info-vax@cernvax via rscs. X-Bitnet-Sender: General Delivery Date: Fri, 26 Jun 87 18:32 N Original_From: Jnet%"ZRKL001@DTUZDV1" Comments: This is gatewayed mail. Warning: Mail may not necessarily be returnable through this path. Subject: 7 TCP/IP packages ... To: sri-kl.arpa!info-vax Received: From CEARN(MAILER) by CRUXNMC with RSCS id 2730 for RSC@CRUXNMC; Fri, 26 Jun 87 18:31 N Received: by CEARN (Mailer X1.24) id 2727; Fri, 26 Jun 87 18:33:14 GVA Date: Fri, 26 Jun 87 17:59 CET Reply-To: Ralf D Kloth Sender: Info Vax From: Ralf D Kloth Subject: 7 TCP/IP packages ... Comments: To: Info-Vax To: ROBERT SCHUMACHER > Recently, a detailed summary of the features and characteristics > of seven different TCP/IP implementations for VAX/VMS was posted. Hello, several people mentioned a survey about 7 TCP/IPs recently. As I did not get that survey, could someone please re-send it to my address? Thank you in advance, Ralf D. Kloth, ZRKL001@DTUZDV1.BITNET ZRKL001%DTUZDV1.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU