Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!RED.RUTGERS.EDU!AWalker
From: AWalker@RED.RUTGERS.EDU.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.os.vms
Subject: security patch
Message-ID: <12308743864.44.AWALKER@RED.RUTGERS.EDU>
Date: Sun, 7-Jun-87 23:09:27 EDT
Article-I.D.: RED.12308743864.44.AWALKER
Posted: Sun Jun  7 23:09:27 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Jun-87 04:12:09 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 11

Why doesn't someone just *post* the Patch input file to infovax, if DEC is
dragging their heels so?  If there are explanatory comments detailing the
security hole in the header of this, you could even strip those out leaving
just the patch data, if it'd make you feel better.

What are the legal ramifications of this?  DEC would seem to have some sort
of responsibility here, and if they've sold people a "secure" OS that every
high school kid is now cruising freely around in the middle of, well, hey.

_H*
-------