Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!AI.AI.MIT.EDU!JBVB
From: JBVB@AI.AI.MIT.EDU ("James B. VanBokkelen")
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re:  TN3270
Message-ID: <208298.870601.JBVB@AI.AI.MIT.EDU>
Date: Mon, 1-Jun-87 23:11:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: AI.208298.870601.JBVB
Posted: Mon Jun  1 23:11:40 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 12:52:04 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 19


    	I inquired of a Network Solutions salesperson ... and
    	he said that their DDN/MVS did not support 3270-mode telnet.
    	
    There must have been some misunderstanding about the question or the
    answer.  DDN/MVS is based on the UCLA MVS code, which certainly does
    support 3270-mode Telnet, and always has....

    Bob Braden

This is what I get for answering my mail while far from my references.
I know that one of the mainframe packages doesn't have TN3270.  Is it
C.I.S.C.O. (not the Bay area gateway people) that doesn't?

jbvb

BTW: I'm still not on the list.  Has there been any further discussion of
the RFC issue?  Also, am I simply not aware of an official MIT redistribution
point?  If so, could someone inform me whom to contact?