Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!CS.UTAH.EDU!peter%gr
From: peter%gr@CS.UTAH.EDU (Peter S. Ford)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: Chrenobyl revisited
Message-ID: <8707010543.AA21583@gr.utah.edu>
Date: Wed, 1-Jul-87 01:43:22 EDT
Article-I.D.: gr.8707010543.AA21583
Posted: Wed Jul  1 01:43:22 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 13:15:44 EDT
References: <8706300222.a002889@Huey.UDEL.EDU>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: peter%gr@cs.utah.edu (Peter S. Ford)
Distribution: world
Organization: University of Utah CS Dept
Lines: 14


This may or may not be related, but on 24 June 1800 MDT we started to
see packets routed through utah-arpa-gw.arpa (CISCO -- 10.3.0.4) with

src IP addr: 128.103.1.54 (husc4.harvard.edu)
dst IP addr: 128.84.252.18 (cornelld.tn.cornell.edu)

To our knowledge the CISCO only advertises reachablity to nets 128.110, and
192.12.56.

This traffic eventually died off.  Must be some swamp out there.

Peter Ford   U of Utah CS department.
peter@cs.utah.edu