Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!gswd-vms.Gould.COM!tucker%mycroft
From: tucker%mycroft@gswd-vms.Gould.COM (Tim Tucker)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IP options implementation
Message-ID: <8706301311.AA01944@gswd-vms.Gould.COM>
Date: Tue, 30-Jun-87 09:10:02 EDT
Article-I.D.: gswd-vms.8706301311.AA01944
Posted: Tue Jun 30 09:10:02 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 17:20:00 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 9

Why didn't Berkeley implement the security option?  Those of us selling systems
to the DOD need to add it anyway and it would probably be nice if a common
implementation across all users of 4.3BSD TCP existed.  Why do I care?  The
security option requires some user space changes to programs like FTP and
TELNET besides just kernel changes.

Tim Tucker
Gould Computer Systems Division
tucker@gswd-vms.Gould.COM