Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!munnari!moncskermit!goanna!cidam!mg
From: mg@cidam.me.rmit.oz (Mike A. Gigante)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.d
Subject: Re: Announcement of unmoderated sources mailing list.
Message-ID: <677@cidam.me.rmit.oz>
Date: Fri, 5-Jun-87 23:16:11 EDT
Article-I.D.: cidam.677
Posted: Fri Jun  5 23:16:11 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 11-Jun-87 01:02:15 EDT
References: <965@vortex.UUCP> <7946@utzoo.UUCP> <7947@utzoo.UUCP> <248@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Organization: RMIT Mech and Prod Engineering, Melbourne, Australia
Lines: 11
Keywords: unmoderated news
Summary: why do you think comp.sources is moderated? can you say "FLAME non-sources postings"? (thought so)

In my opinion, all this talk of the need for non-moderated sources group 
is ridiculous.  The moderator make no value judgements on the postings, justs
posts the stuff out.  He *DOES* however filter out all the non-sources postings
that used to clog net.sources.

How many messages in net.sources were either non-sources and/or flames for 
non-sources?

It's about time this ridiculous discussion stopped.

Mike Gigante RMIT, Australia	{seismo,hplabs,ukc}!munnari!cidam.oz!mg