Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!husc6!husc4!hadeishi
From: hadeishi@husc4.HARVARD.EDU (mitsuharu hadeishi)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Amiga: Which replacment OS?/UN*X ??
Message-ID: <2334@husc6.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 17-Jun-87 14:06:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: husc6.2334
Posted: Wed Jun 17 14:06:45 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jun-87 10:08:35 EDT
References: <600@gryphon.CTS.COM> <1705@vdsvax.steinmetz.UUCP>
Sender: news@husc6.UUCP
Reply-To: hadeishi@husc4.UUCP (mitsuharu hadeishi)
Distribution: world
Organization: Harvard Univ. Science Center
Lines: 10
Summary: Order of list determines priority

In article <580@ucdavis.UUCP> flocchini@ucdavis.UUCP (flocchini) writes:
>I would assume that the 32-bit memory has priority when both 16 bit and 32 bit
>memory are in the system.

	I believe the memory priority is somehow determined by the order
in which the boards are added to the FAST memory list.  I'm not sure
whether the autoconfig standard has a way for a board to ensure that it
gets added at the highest priority or not.  Carolyn?

				-Mitsu