Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!hoptoad!academ!uhnix1!sugar!peter
From: peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter DaSilva)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: shared libraries, a call for CATS to come to the rescue!
Message-ID: <203@sugar.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 18-Jun-87 20:42:21 EDT
Article-I.D.: sugar.203
Posted: Thu Jun 18 20:42:21 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 25-Jun-87 06:32:00 EDT
References: <8706110603.AA27095@cogsci.berkeley.edu> <1379@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Organization: Sugar Land UNIX - Houston, TX
Lines: 11

> jmsynge@sqm.dec.com (James M Synge) wrote:
> >I would suggest that Commodore perform the same registration service with
> >library names as they've done with Zorro id's and IFF hunk names.

> bryce@COGSCI.BERKELEY.EDU (Bryce Nesbitt) replied:
> >"DOS " "NDOS" and "KICK" are taken, but I will stake claim to "DOS2" or "DOS+"
Then page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page) added:
> Hmmm.  Good to see some support for this.  If we're grabbing, I'd like
> "ADOS" or "CDOS" ... is case significant?

How about "UNIX" or "TAR" or "CPIO"? :->