Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
From: jdg@elmgate.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Editors, to DME or not to DME, that's not the question
Message-ID: <650@elmgate.UUCP>
Date: Wed, 24-Jun-87 12:38:57 EDT
Article-I.D.: elmgate.650
Posted: Wed Jun 24 12:38:57 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 27-Jun-87 01:20:11 EDT
References: <1209@spice.cs.cmu.edu> <8706120436.AA07456@cogsci.berkeley.edu> <184@sugar.UUCP>
Reply-To: jdg@aurora.UUCP (Jeff Gortatowsky)
Organization: Eastman Kodak Company, Rochester, NY
Lines: 17
Keywords: editors religion gospel Ollie North CPUs Intel vs. Motorola etc..
Summary: Man prefers uEMACS over girls!... Film at 11.....

In article <184@sugar.UUCP> peter@sugar.UUCP (Peter DaSilva) writes:
>> But would SOFTWARE companies like this?! The market for a programmer's editor
>> is kinda down_the_tubes if everyone has Matt's DME...
>
>Everyone already has MicroEmacs, which is a better programmer's editor than
>DME. DME is cute, but it doesn't even support the standard Amiga user ...

And of course vi is a thousand times `better' then MicroEmacs.
Ah, freedom of speech is a wonderful thing....

Oh yes, in case you aren't sure..... 8^) :') )8^>

-- 
Jeff Gortatowsky       {seismo,allegra}!rochester!kodak!elmgate!jdg
Eastman Kodak Company  
These comments are mine alone and not Eastman Kodak's. How's that for a
simple and complete disclaimer?