Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!ut-sally!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!esunix!blgardne
From: blgardne@esunix.UUCP (Blaine Gardner)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: mount vs. 3.5" drives
Message-ID: <384@esunix.UUCP>
Date: Sun, 28-Jun-87 18:05:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: esunix.384
Posted: Sun Jun 28 18:05:03 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 1-Jul-87 02:35:06 EDT
Organization: Evans & Sutherland Computer Corporation
Lines: 10
Keywords: why

A question that has occured to me while trying to get an 80 track 5.25"
drive to work on my Amiga: Why don't 3.5" drives have to be "mounted"?

What "magic" is there in the 3.5" drives that allows them to be
automatically recognized by the system, that the 5.25" drives don't
have?
-- 
Blaine Gardner @ Evans & Sutherland
UUCP Address:   {ihnp4,decvax}!decwrl!esunix!blgardne
Alternate:      {ihnp4,seismo}!utah-cs!utah-gr!uplherc!esunix!blgardne