Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!mit-eddie!ll-xn!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!JASPER.PALLADIAN.COM!dp
From: dp@JASPER.PALLADIAN.COM (Jeffrey Del Papa)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apollo
Subject: Re: DM vs. Emacs
Message-ID: <870622232651.1.DP@BANFF.PALLADIAN.COM>
Date: Mon, 22-Jun-87 23:26:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: BANFF.870622232651.1.DP
Posted: Mon Jun 22 23:26:00 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 24-Jun-87 05:52:47 EDT
References: <8706222144.AA03493@hi-csc.uucp>
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Reply-To: Jeffrey Del Papa <DP%JASPER@LIVE-OAK.LCS.MIT.EDU>
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 15


    Date: Mon, 22 Jun 87 16:44:29 cdt
    From: Brett Slocum <hi-csc!slocum@umn-cs.ARPA>

    The only system that I know of that has an Emacs-like editor
    integrated into the system to the extent that the DM is, is 
    Symbolics (as has been pointed out).  And as has been pointed
    out, Zmacs is getting pretty slow.  

The TI Explorer (and LMI Lmabda) also have integrated emacs. Since they have not
"improved" the window interface, they are still quite fast. ('bolics zmacs isn't that
bad when you aren't using the mouse, it is just that 7.0 really slowed the mouse
down)

<dp>