Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!columbia!rutgers!sri-spam!mordor!lll-tis!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!ho7cad!wjc
From: wjc@ho5cad.ATT.COM
Newsgroups: comp.sys.att
Subject: Re: 120 vs 150 ns DRAMs in Combo Board
Message-ID: <188@ho7cad.ATT.COM>
Date: Wed, 1-Jul-87 20:00:14 EDT
Article-I.D.: ho7cad.188
Posted: Wed Jul  1 20:00:14 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 07:50:42 EDT
References: <1385@ethos.UUCP>
Sender: nuucp@ho7cad.ATT.COM
Lines: 14
In-reply-to: cliff@ethos.UUCP's message of 1 Jul 87 03:51:09 GMT

Posting-Front-End: GNU Emacs 18.47.1 of Fri Jun 26 1987 on ho5cad (usg-unix-v)


In article <1385@ethos.UUCP> cliff@ethos.UUCP (Cliff Elam) writes:

>   Does the title say it all?  If I have 0 waits on my 10Mhz bus
>   I assume I need 120ns (or better) but if they're 1 or more
>   waits I suspect I could use 150's.  Since I'm going to be

If you buy a memory expansion card with RAM installed, it's got 150ns.
I've heard that there are no wait states on the motherboard, but it is
possible that it's a different story on the expansion bus.  I'm not in
a position to know.

	Bill Carpenter
	(AT&T gateways)!ho5cad!wjc
	HO 1L-410, (201)949-8392