Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!ames!think!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!dayton!viper!john
From: john@viper.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.sys.ibm.pc
Subject: Re: MSC toupper (was  Re: MS-DOS NRO )
Message-ID: <1081@viper.Lynx.MN.ORG>
Date: Wed, 3-Jun-87 15:20:45 EDT
Article-I.D.: viper.1081
Posted: Wed Jun  3 15:20:45 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 6-Jun-87 04:32:13 EDT
References: <405@ritcv.UUCP> <725@thumper.UUCP> <345@polyslo.UUCP> <348@polyslo.UUCP> <2576@ncoast.UUCP>
Reply-To: john@viper.UUCP (John Stanley)
Distribution: na
Organization: DynaSoft Systems
Lines: 19
Keywords: NRO
Xref: utgpu comp.lang.c:2225 comp.sys.ibm.pc:4009

In article <348@polyslo.UUCP>, mpatnode@polyslo.UUCP (Mike Patnode) writes:
 > 
 > #define toupper	((isupper(c)) ? _tolower(c) : (c))
 > 

  While I'm sure this is just an oversight, I'm a bit surprised 
nobody else noticed and/or commented-on this...  The define given 
is actualy the one for tolower(), not toupper() (and it's missing 
the dummy parameter "c")....

  The defines should be:

#define toupper(c)	(islower(c) ? _toupper(c) : (c))
#define tolower(c)	(isupper(c) ? _tolower(c) : (c))

--- 
John Stanley (john@viper.UUCP)
Software Consultant - DynaSoft Systems
UUCP: ...{amdahl,ihnp4,rutgers}!{meccts,dayton}!viper!john