Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!lsuc!jimomura From: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.sys.m6809 Subject: Re: CoCo3 OS-9 Level II Message-ID: <1865@lsuc.UUCP> Date: Sat, 13-Jun-87 14:41:41 EDT Article-I.D.: lsuc.1865 Posted: Sat Jun 13 14:41:41 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 13-Jun-87 16:35:16 EDT References: <1851@lsuc.UUCP> <1736@ihwpt.ATT.COM> Reply-To: jimomura@lsuc.UUCP (Jim Omura) Organization: Consultant, Toronto Lines: 41 Summary: Thanks and ... Thanks Mike. I had read your earlier posting, but mainly for the the windowing info. As such, I stuck it onto the stack and all I know is "it's on file there somewhere". Besides which, I felt that after a while you might have more info (always a good excuse when I'm being lazy :-). Anyway, I'm writing a graphics program with what spare time I have. I'm not sure what I'm going to do with it when I'm done. I've considered a few things, but currently it boils down to this: I'm writing a program which is sort of based on Jim Kent's "Flicker" animation program for the Atari ST. Jim's an old CoCo author (he wrote the Micro Illustrator for the Color Computer--don't blame him for the poor joystick interface because that wasn't his fault). Jim allowed me to copy his user interface. Just recently however, I think Jim's gotten interested in porting "Flicker" to the CoCo3 under OS-9. I sent him a note when I realized how *easy* it would be to do the animation parts. Now, I'm going to write my program anyway, but if Jim comes out with "Flicker" then it'll be the better program, so there won't be any point in my doing anything until he decides whether he'd want to do anything with "Flicker". As for C v. BASIC09, it's interesting. I'm starting to think that for this program C won't give any noticable advantage. The graphics routines in 'gfx2' are fine. There are a few things that could be added, but then you can always add another machine language file to call from BASIC09. Mainly what BASIC09 will be doing will be following the mouse (one way or the other). Also, the way I program in BASIC09, it might be easier to translate it to Assembler than to C. In fact, I could try Pascal. I have the compiler but haven't used it since I switched to Level II. Now that I think about it, the main reason I didn't even start in C was the fact that my C compiler is still not working pending a patch to redirect the compiler from looking to /d1 for libraries and defs. I still haven't found the patch to make that change. Cheers! -- Jim O. -- Jim Omura, 2A King George's Drive, Toronto, (416) 652-3880 ihnp4!utzoo!lsuc!jimomura Byte Information eXchange: jimomura