Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!super.upenn.edu!linc.cis.upenn.edu!salex
From: salex@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Scott Alexander)
Newsgroups: comp.terminals,comp.emacs
Subject: Re: VT100's keeping up at high baud rates
Message-ID: <1377@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu>
Date: Mon, 22-Jun-87 19:47:03 EDT
Article-I.D.: super.1377
Posted: Mon Jun 22 19:47:03 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 23-Jun-87 06:40:16 EDT
References: <1119@copper.TEK.COM> <4101@teddy.UUCP> <17160@amdcad.AMD.COM> <2751@phri.UUCP>
Sender: root@super.upenn.edu.upenn.edu
Reply-To: salex@linc.cis.upenn.edu (Scott Alexander)
Organization: University of Pennsylvania
Lines: 20
Xref: mnetor comp.terminals:323 comp.emacs:1219

In article <2751@phri.UUCP> roy@phri.UUCP (Roy Smith) writes:
>
>	The last terminal I saw which could keep up with a steady 19.2
>kbaud was the good old ADM-5.  True, it didn't have all the fancy ansi
>escape sequences, but I think you could simulate a reverse-scroll by

>-- 
>Roy Smith, {allegra,cmcl2,philabs}!phri!roy
>System Administrator, Public Health Research Institute
>455 First Avenue, New York, NY 10016

Back at Rice, we had a passel of wyse-75s.  Near as we could tell,
they kept up nicely at 19.2kb.  Now, I was never certain that the DEC
terminal multiplexers and VMS and Unix were sending out that 19.2 w/o
piles of space between the characters, but my emacs never complained
about ^s/^q problems.  It is even compatible with the vt100 (though
not the vt10x for just about an value of x.)

Scott Alexander
salex@linc.cis.upenn.edu