Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!seismo!decuac!macom1!michael From: michael@macom1.UUCP Newsgroups: comp.unix.questions Subject: Re: cu Message-ID: <205@macom1.UUCP> Date: Mon, 8-Jun-87 08:23:35 EDT Article-I.D.: macom1.205 Posted: Mon Jun 8 08:23:35 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 10-Jun-87 01:39:57 EDT References: <237@swlabs.UUCP> Organization: CENTEL Business Information Systems INC.,Rockville, MD. Lines: 32 in article <237@swlabs.UUCP>, jack@swlabs.UUCP (Jack Bonn) says: > > I have a question for you. Is 3.0 the latest version of Xenix running on > a 310? I have the task of helping my agent get his 310 system running > and he is running Xenix v1.0! It is really a pain. Does 3.0 have a getty? > Is there a call to IOCTL(2) in section 2 of the manual? I am trying to have > him use the same modem for originating and terminating calls. I have a > program here to do it, but it relies on running under System V (I think). > I am having him order the upgrade, but I don't know if it will help. The latest version is Xenix 3.4, Intel frees up quite a bit of kernal space in this one, plus fixes some bugs in cu, and several device driver rewrites. For the military users of the 310, there is a considerable wait to upgrade to the new 3.4, partly because of Intel, but the biggest hitch was getting the new release approved by the systems people at Ft Huachuka Az. I belive the priorities on upgrade go like this: Sites with level A maint. contract and have Open-net " " without network. System purchased without the update included, and are in the 90 day preiod. Then comes about everyone else that may want it. For people that like to make as much use of the tunable params as possible, I would highly recomend 3.4, Intel did a great job of cleaning up the kernal. Intel is shipping 3.4 with all the new systems, but I don't know the date this was initiated. john m mullins disclaimer: This guy doesn't know a micro-chip from a micro organism!