Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!uunet!steinmetz!davidsen From: davidsen@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Newsgroups: comp.unix.wizards Subject: Re: UUCP for PCs Message-ID: <6234@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> Date: Thu, 11-Jun-87 12:18:24 EDT Article-I.D.: steinmet.6234 Posted: Thu Jun 11 12:18:24 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 20-Jun-87 10:09:01 EDT References: <7743@brl-adm.ARPA> Reply-To: davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) Organization: General Electric CRD, Schenectady, NY Lines: 37 In article <7743@brl-adm.ARPA> GREIF@XX.LCS.MIT.EDU (Irene Greif) writes: >Can anyone recommend a PC Unix with a UUCP that is known to work? (One >that has been installed and is in use as a server for an organization with >many email users.) There are three systems I've used. PC/IX - an old klunky Sys III implementation which has proved itself in three years of service on numerous machines here. As a mail server it is dead reliable. Limitations: 2 serial ports. XENIX - supports multiple users, can use up to 16 lines. It will not lose data with two 9600 baud connections coming in, I don't know about more. The manual for 2.1.3 admits that the implementation is V7 rather than SysV. Limitations: when calling out the BREAK in L.sys sends three nulls rather than a real break. This won't reliably autobaud on some systems. It may be fixed in 2.2. I'm told that Excelan ethernet stuff doesn't run on 2.2, by a user who's giving me his Enet board. There may be an upgrade, or you may not care. V/AT - testing on two systems indicates that there may be problems losing data input at high speeds. This can be shown by tying two ports at 9600 and using cu, or running uucp at 9600 to other machines. We are told that this is not the case with "real IBM serial ports" (we're using AST boards). Other symptoms are "tss: double panic" messages followed by having to power down. Outside of cost and slots, you can only run IBM serial ports for two lines. There may not be a problem at lower speeds, etc. If I were doing it and could live with two ports, I'd run PC/IX without a doubt, just because it's so reliable. Other versions may be available from Interactive Systems. -- bill davidsen (wedu@ge-crd.arpa) {chinet | philabs | sesimo}!steinmetz!crdos1!davidsen "Stupidity, like virtue, is its own reward" -me