Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!mit-eddie!think!ames!sdcsvax!ucbvax!ramoth.sgi.COM!msc From: msc@ramoth.sgi.COM (Mark Callow) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x Subject: Re: overlay canvases Message-ID: <8706052332.AA27297@ramoth.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 5-Jun-87 19:32:07 EDT Article-I.D.: ramoth.8706052332.AA27297 Posted: Fri Jun 5 19:32:07 1987 Date-Received: Wed, 10-Jun-87 01:18:21 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 32 Again these are weaknesses in the implementation not in the model. > I guess I don't see that much of a distinction. Unless you somehow The essential point is that weaknesses in the implementation of an idea are not a good reason to throw out the idea itself. My preferred paint palette is the whole screen anyway. I wouldn't use a menu. I'd just let you pick any color on the screen. > User-interface religion as a justification for not providing > mechanism ... That's a cheap shot made possible by using a quote in isolation. In the sentence before this I described a way to provide full color menus. I was merely stating my preference. I would never let my preferences be a justification for not providing mechanism. > Not to belabor this discussion, but somehow I doubt your screen > starts off with 2^24 colors already on it from which to "pick". Having 2^24 colors on a menu would be totally impractical even if it were possible (there aren't enough pixels on the screen to display all those colors at once). However your real question here, "how do you get colors if you don't have much on your screen", is a good one. The answer is a simple tool to display the color map. Let's continues any further discussion privately. This debate has already degenerated too far toward a childish "yes it is, no it isn't" style. -- From the TARDIS of Mark Callow msc@sgi.sgi.com, ...{ames,decwrl,sun}!sgi!msc "There is much virtue in a window. It is to a human being as a frame is to a painting, as a proscenium to a play. It strongly defines its content."