Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!husc6!bloom-beacon!bu-cs!m2c!ulowell!page
From: page@ulowell.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.admin
Subject: Re: New groups coming in without newgroup?
Message-ID: <1355@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu>
Date: Mon, 8-Jun-87 13:45:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: ulowell.1355
Posted: Mon Jun  8 13:45:40 1987
Date-Received: Wed, 10-Jun-87 04:54:08 EDT
References: <336@acornrc.UUCP> <6933@mimsy.UUCP> <6341@garnet.BBN.COM> <2262@hoptoad.uucp> <19249@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU> <1261@oliveb.UUCP>
Reply-To: page@ulowell.cs.ulowell.edu (Bob Page)
Organization: University of Lowell
Lines: 14
Xref: utgpu news.groups:892 news.admin:451

jerry@oliveb.UUCP (Jerry F Aguirre) wrote:
>I have no objection to getting the groups, the more the merrier.

Many Usenet-only (read: non-Internet) admins that I've spoken to
about this agree with Jerry; more news is OK, and that maybe
a portion of the Internet "news" can be gatewayed to Usenet.
Many non-Internet sites get the stuff via e-mail right now anyway.

I suppose "portion" might mean "can be released to non-DOD/ARPA sites,"
although isn't that what the 'ddn' distribution is for?

..Bob
-- 
Bob Page, U of Lowell CS Dept.   page@ulowell.{uucp,edu,csnet}