Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brandx.rutgers.edu!webber
From: webber@brandx.rutgers.edu.UUCP
Newsgroups: news.groups,news.misc,news.stargate,news.sysadmin,news.admin
Subject: Re: EndOfSourcesList+AnnouncementOfNetOmbudsman
Message-ID: <270@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Date: Tue, 30-Jun-87 00:27:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: brandx.270
Posted: Tue Jun 30 00:27:50 1987
Date-Received: Fri, 3-Jul-87 06:35:43 EDT
References: <266@brandx.rutgers.edu> <15982@gatech.gatech.edu>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 21
Keywords: solving the moderation bottleneck?  Ha!
Xref: utgpu news.groups:1039 news.misc:540 news.stargate:181 news.sysadmin:220 news.admin:504
Summary: interesting.
To: webber,spaf@gatech.edu

In article <15982@gatech.gatech.edu>, spaf@gatech.edu (Gene Spafford) writes:
> to address them point-by-point.  I'm also pretty pissed at his
> "holier-than-thou" attitude.  If you don't read this whole thing, at
> least read the last paragraph.]

> I could go on at length because I'm so pissed, but I won't.  Many of us
> have tried to explain in mail to Mr. Webber about things like ...

I think these two quotes sum it up.  The sender was p*ss*d.  The stuff for
new users tells you not to post in such a condition, but with all that
experiance, what do you expect.  Anyway, I am willing to wait a few
days until the poster is `unp*ss*d' and see if he still wants to post the
things he did.  For the record, nothing in the message seemed relevant
and I feel I can address any of the issues raised if I can only find 
someone who both believes one of the things posted and isn't
simultaneously `p*ss*d'.

Incidently, also for the record, I am no longer net ombudsman -- see
other message in news.groups.

------------------------------ BOB (webber@aramis.rutgers.edu)