Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!gatech!mit-eddie!husc6!cca!mirror!ishmael!inmet!janw
From: janw@inmet.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Knowledge and the Academics
Message-ID: <160200003@inmet>
Date: Tue, 16-Jun-87 10:24:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: inmet.160200003
Posted: Tue Jun 16 10:24:00 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 21-Jun-87 11:40:58 EDT
References: <16224@brahms.Berkeley.EDU>
Lines: 23
Nf-ID: #R:brahms.Berkeley.EDU:-1622400:inmet:160200003:000:784
Nf-From: inmet.UUCP!janw    Jun 16 10:24:00 1987


[franka@mmintl.UUCP ]
>In article <160200002@inmet> janw@inmet.UUCP writes:
>>Can machines be made to  think?  Is  intelligence  heritable?  Is
>>overpopulation  imminent?   --  These are examples of interesting
>>nonscientific questions,

>I am curious about why "is intelligence heritable?" was included in this
>list.  

Because intelligence is undefined; perhaps undefinable; but
certainly far from being defined in any scientific sense.

Also because of the way the question is actually being asked  and
"answered" : very unscientific.

Usage determines the character of the question, just as it determines
the meaning of words.

I don't deny that some day a question containing these words *may*
be scientifically asked; but it will not be the same question.

			Jan Wasilewsky