Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!decvax!decwrl!pyramid!prls!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
From: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Newsgroups: sci.philosophy.tech
Subject: Re: Two Objections to Vacuum Genesis
Message-ID: <2245@mmintl.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 2-Jul-87 14:45:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: mmintl.2245
Posted: Thu Jul  2 14:45:15 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 4-Jul-87 19:49:24 EDT
References: <4080@jade.BERKELEY.EDU> <8706261209.AA04305@brahms.Berkeley.EDU>
Reply-To: franka@mmintl.UUCP (Frank Adams)
Organization: Multimate International, E. Hartford, CT.
Lines: 9
Keywords: :-)

In article <8706261209.AA04305@brahms.Berkeley.EDU> obnoxio@brahms.berkeley.edu (Obnoxious Math Grad Student) writes:
>In article <4080@jade.BERKELEY.EDU>, lagache@violet (Edouard Lagache)
>>               looks very much like an infinite regress.
>Indeed it does.  So what's wrong with an infinite regress?
I don't know.  What is wrong with an infinite regress?
-- 

Frank Adams                           ihnp4!philabs!pwa-b!mmintl!franka
Ashton-Tate          52 Oakland Ave North         E. Hartford, CT 06108