Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!seismo!rutgers!sri-spam!ames!ucbcad!ucbvax!hplabs!hp-pcd!uoregon!chemstor!bob
From: bob@chemstor.UUCP (Robert Weigel)
Newsgroups: sci.research,sci.med,talk.rumors,misc.headlines
Subject: Re: Chris imitates Life?
Message-ID: <283@chemstor.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 4-Jun-87 12:01:07 EDT
Article-I.D.: chemstor.283
Posted: Thu Jun  4 12:01:07 1987
Date-Received: Tue, 9-Jun-87 07:18:03 EDT
References: <6693@allegra.UUCP> <1664@tekcrl.TEK.COM> <1084@aecom.YU.EDU> <225@chemstor.UUCP> <1199@isl1.ri.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: bob@chemstor.UUCP (Bob Weigel)
Organization: University of Oregon Chemstores, Eugene OR
Lines: 36
Keywords: Missing dimension
Xref: mnetor sci.research:154 sci.med:2344 talk.rumors:864 misc.headlines:637


>From: cycy@isl1.ri.cmu.edu (Christopher Young)
>In article <225@chemstor.UUCP>, bob@chemstor.UUCP (Robert Weigel) writes:
> 
>>and randomness.  Either way, I'm not in control,.. right!!  My Bible says God
>>created the creatures out of the dirt, but he made man in his image.  ( With 
>>a free will too!)  Somehow, that seems to fit reality a little better in view 
>>of who I am.  But keep on matching those Chromosomes! 
>  
>These types eventually show up everywhere, don't they? Just like weeds.


     Wow Chris,.. you write your own material???  Actually, my "type" as
you put it is, both on this network and the world, as statistically dominant
as productive plants are in an average field.  But let us not take the analogy
too far.  
     I guess you thought by ripping my last paragraph out from its groundwork
everyone would forget what was written right before that, and you could draw
a steriotypical conclusion of who I am for all those incapable of thinking for
themselves.  It seems that you are also trying to define science for me?  Is
not science simply the compilation and correlation of sensory data, towards
the future prediction of events??  Did anyone ever really get down and say
"only information compiled by out external senses (ie. eyes, ears, etc.) allowed
here?  Even if they did, I don't see why I should respect their opinion without
CONCLUSIVE proof that those are the only sensors.  I know, I know, that's not
possible to provide, right?  So why don't you go back and try to provide a
decent comment on my words before the ones you quoted, because they are quite
conclusive.  If you consider them, you will find that either there is really
more to me and you than what we see, or everything is meaningless.


-------------------------------
"Who is the greater fool: He that claims to know truth, or the one who scoffs
while himself searching for it?"  -me

Total disclaimer--My words are not my own, nor my employers.