Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!ptsfa!lll-lcc!mordor!lll-tis!ames!amdahl!chuck
From: chuck@amdahl.UUCP
Newsgroups: sci.research
Subject: Re: Chris imitates Life?
Message-ID: <8411@amdahl.amdahl.com>
Date: Fri, 12-Jun-87 04:42:20 EDT
Article-I.D.: amdahl.8411
Posted: Fri Jun 12 04:42:20 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 14-Jun-87 01:48:26 EDT
References: <6693@allegra.UUCP> <1664@tekcrl.TEK.COM> <1084@aecom.YU.EDU> <283@chemstor.UUCP> <1203@isl1.ri.cmu.edu>
Reply-To: dale.weaver@d1.dartvax.edu
Followup-To: comp.god,rec.god,sci.god,talk.god
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 12
Keywords: god, religion, hallucinations, lsd
Summary: lets move this conversation

>>My Bible says God
>>created the creatures out of the dirt, but he made man in his image.  ( With 
>>a free will too!)  Somehow, that seems to fit reality a little better in view 
>>of who I am.
>the Bible.
>God is supernatural. God is not a scientific
>concept. Even if God does exist (and I will not say what my opinion on the
>matter is here), God's existence is not scientific concept.
>creationism can never be considered science by anybody who understand it. The
>Bible just doesn't cut it scientifically speaking.

Could we move this out of sci.research and into a more appropriate newsgroup?