Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!gatech!hao!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!cbosgd!cwruecmp!hal!ncoast!allbery From: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) Newsgroups: comp.sources.d Subject: Re: EndOfSourcesList+AnnouncementOfNetOmbudsman Message-ID: <2849@ncoast.UUCP> Date: Fri, 10-Jul-87 22:43:25 EDT Article-I.D.: ncoast.2849 Posted: Fri Jul 10 22:43:25 1987 Date-Received: Sun, 12-Jul-87 15:54:40 EDT References: <267@brandx.rutgers.edu> <1610@celtics.UUCP> <275@brandx.rutgers.edu> <2778@ncoast.UUCP> <287@brandx.rutgers.edu> Reply-To: allbery@ncoast.UUCP (Brandon Allbery) Followup-To: comp.sources.d Organization: Cleveland Public Access UN*X, Cleveland, Oh Lines: 24 As quoted from <287@brandx.rutgers.edu> by webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber): +--------------- | was plenty. Before you start talking about procedure, please show me | when it was voted upon that net.sources and mod.sources would be | merged and subsequently split into multiple moderated groups as well | as how you ended up being the moderator of the one that is currently | closest in goals to the old net.sources. It strikes me that your | interest in proper procedure is rather new found. +--------------- I have *that* letter too. Basically, Rick Adams _told_ me that net.sources was becoming comp.sources.misc and that it WOULD be moderated -- no question, no place for me to complain. He then _asked_ me whether I would like to be the moderator of the group. Tell me, where did you get the idea that *I* chose to make net.sources moderated? It seems to me that, having run out of real arguments, you're just lashing out blindly at me for having the temerarity to contradict you. -- [Copyright 1987 Brandon S. Allbery, all rights reserved] \ ncoast 216 781 6201 [Redistributable only if redistribution is subsequently permitted.] \ 2400 bd. Brandon S. Allbery, moderator of comp.sources.misc and comp.binaries.ibm.pc {{ames,harvard,mit-eddie}!necntc,{well,ihnp4}!hoptoad,cbosgd}!ncoast!allbery <>