Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!labrea!aurora!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c,comp.arch
Subject: Re: Was the 360 badly-designed?  (was Re: Compatibility with EBCDIC)
Message-ID: <1035@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 22-Aug-87 10:40:50 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.1035
Posted: Sat Aug 22 10:40:50 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Aug-87 13:30:47 EDT
References: <855@tjalk.cs.vu.nl> <2683@hoptoad.uucp>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 7
Summary: No stack, small segments, nonstandard character set with holes
Xref: mnetor comp.lang.c:3836 comp.arch:1869

In article <1580@sol.ARPA> crowl@cs.rochester.edu (Lawrence Crowl) writes:
>. . .one needs VERY good arguments to claim that the 360
>architecture was badly-designed.

No stack, small segments, nonstandard character set with holes.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi