Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!rutgers!okstate!svo!mfbbs!marc
From: marc@mfbbs.UUCP (Marc Randolph)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Synchronous 9600bps Smart Modems?
Message-ID: <2072@mfbbs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 15:56:38 EDT
Article-I.D.: mfbbs.2072
Posted: Thu Aug  6 15:56:38 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 14:58:08 EDT
References: <616@bbking.PRC.Unisys.COM> <3649@well.UUCP> <54@oresoft.UUCP> <6900@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP>
Reply-To: marc@mfbbs.UUCP (Marc Randolph)
Distribution: na
Organization: usr/bbs development center, Tulsa, Ok
Lines: 14

In article <6900@steinmetz.steinmetz.UUCP> davidsen@kbsvax.steinmetz.UUCP (William E. Davidsen Jr) writes:
>please post.  I am looking at the HST and need to know (a) if it is a
>reasonably good 1200/2400 modem, and (b) if it works at 9600.  I already

 a) Yes, the HST is a *very* good 1200/2400bps modem.  It is the same thing
    as the Courier 2400 with even more features, including MNP.
 b) It works very well at 9600bps.  I've made a limited number of LONG
    DISTANCE calls at 9600 and it worked everytime.  I have downloaded files
    from a local bbs with the HST that have exceeded 10100bps.  Over all, I've
    been using the HST for 3 months with no problems AT ALL.  I know of three
    other HST's (operating on local bulletin boards) that have the same record,
    and over 200 Fido compatible systems are running them.
---
Marc Randolph	...!rutgers!pbox!mfbbs!marc