Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!mimsy!oddjob!gargoyle!ihnp4!homxb!mtuxo!strider From: strider@mtuxo.UUCP (M.COVINGTON) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems Subject: Re: RS-232C Message-ID: <566@mtuxo.UUCP> Date: Wed, 19-Aug-87 16:48:31 EDT Article-I.D.: mtuxo.566 Posted: Wed Aug 19 16:48:31 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 22-Aug-87 04:50:06 EDT References: <192@caeco.UUCP> <2849@phri.UUCP> <1102@gilsys.UUCP> <2853@phri.UUCP> <14000@topaz.rutgers.edu> Organization: AT&T, Middletown NJ Lines: 31 In article <14000@topaz.rutgers.edu>, ron@topaz.rutgers.edu (Ron Natalie) writes: > > RS-232C was published back in the days when half-duplex connections > > were much more common. The RTS/CTS lines are intended to be used to > > negotiate line turn-around in a half-duplex connection. When the the DTE > > This is correct, it isn't just for half-duplex transmissions though. > > Your definitions of DTR/DSR/RI/CD are a bit off. . . > While carrier is detected CD is asserted. > > Generally, the host should watch CD to see if the connection went > away. DSR going away means for some reason the modem itself gave > up (like it was turned off). True. Also, generally the modem will not provide CTS unless it has detected carrier and asserted CD. +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Ty Covington | "Given a choice between two evils... | | mtuxo!strider | I always pick the one I never tried before"| | 201-898-6246 | -Mae West- | | | | +---------------------+---------------------------------------------+ | Disclaimer: | | -Why settle for fried, | | when you can get net.flame broiled?- | | The secretary has disavowed all knowledge of my activities | +-------------------------------------------------------------------+