Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!clyde!cbosgd!ihnp4!inuxc!iuvax!bsu-cs!dhesi
From: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.edu
Subject: Re: readable [was: first] languages
Message-ID: <1041@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Date: Sat, 22-Aug-87 19:26:56 EDT
Article-I.D.: bsu-cs.1041
Posted: Sat Aug 22 19:26:56 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Aug-87 18:37:52 EDT
References: <405@ndsuvax.UUCP> <1010@argus.UUCP> <290@rruxa.UUCP> <1039@bsu-cs.UUCP>
Reply-To: dhesi@bsu-cs.UUCP (Rahul Dhesi)
Organization: CS Dept, Ball St U, Muncie, Indiana
Lines: 12
Summary: C versus Pascal is an incomplete dichotomy

In article <1039@bsu-cs.UUCP> neubauer@bsu-cs.UUCP (Paul Neubauer) writes
an article favoring Pascal over C for first-year students.

This may be more of an aside than an argument.

C versus Pascal is an incomplete dichotomy.

The argument ought really to be C+lint versus Pascal.

Now everybody, start over.
-- 
Rahul Dhesi         UUCP:  {ihnp4,seismo}!{iuvax,pur-ee}!bsu-cs!dhesi