Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!topaz.rutgers.edu!brandx.rutgers.edu!webber
From: webber@brandx.rutgers.edu (Webber)
Newsgroups: rec.video,comp.sys.amiga,comp.graphics
Subject: Re: Video
Message-ID: <322@brandx.rutgers.edu>
Date: Sat, 8-Aug-87 23:43:15 EDT
Article-I.D.: brandx.322
Posted: Sat Aug  8 23:43:15 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Aug-87 13:06:18 EDT
References: <1782@ccicpg.UUCP> <1392@chinet.UUCP>
Organization: Rutgers Univ., New Brunswick, N.J.
Lines: 18
Keywords: Quality, price, performance
Summary: no relation
Xref: mnetor rec.video:1602 comp.sys.amiga:7253 comp.graphics:1031

In article <1392@chinet.UUCP>, randy@chinet.UUCP (Randy Suess) writes:
> In article <1782@ccicpg.UUCP> harald@ccicpg.UUCP ( Harald Milne) writes:
> ]
> ]	I am sorry to say, but VHS stinks by any yardstick. Now that VHS
> ]is supposedly the standard of junk, what's in the future of JUNK? S-VHS....
> 	Who is this guy?  A relative of Bob Webbers?

Nope.  No relation at all.

I am quite happy with the 240 lines of color video resolution that VHS
delivers.  It seems quite appropriate to the current state of the film
industry.  I also find it particularly amusing that VCRs make sharper
b&w pictures than color, automatically taking into account the higher
quality of the older b&w movies over the more recent drek coming out
of hollywood (if it weren't for the special effects, there would be no
effects at all).

------ BOB (webber@aramis.rutgers.edu ; rutgers!aramis.rutgers.edu!webber)