Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!utgpu!water!watmath!orchid!gamiddleton
From: gamiddleton@orchid.UUCP
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: dumb question, probably
Message-ID: <10145@orchid.waterloo.edu>
Date: Fri, 7-Aug-87 19:02:40 EDT
Article-I.D.: orchid.10145
Posted: Fri Aug  7 19:02:40 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 9-Aug-87 01:02:29 EDT
References: <10120@orchid.waterloo.edu>
Reply-To: gamiddleton@orchid.waterloo.edu (Guy Middleton)
Distribution: comp
Organization: University of Waterloo
Lines: 16

In article <10120@orchid.waterloo.edu> gamiddleton@orchid.waterloo.edu (Guy Middleton) writes:
> As far as I can tell, the following fragment should be (syntactically)
> correct:
> 
> [some stuff with constructors ... ]
> 
> It works fine if zot::zot() is left undeclared (leaving 'void' out).
> What am I missing?  Or is this a bug?

Several helpful people have pointed out that constructors do not have
types, not even 'void'.  In that case, it wasn't a *completely* dumb
question, since the example I used (at the top of page 180 of the C++ book)
has the same error.
__
 -Guy Middleton, University of Waterloo Institute for Computer Research
  gamiddleton@math.waterloo.edu, watmath!gamiddleton, gamiddleton@water.bitnet