Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!rutgers!husc6!cmcl2!esquire!roger
From: roger@esquire.UUCP (Roger Reid)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: goto's in C: an opinion...
Message-ID: <141@esquire.UUCP>
Date: Tue, 4-Aug-87 09:28:23 EDT
Article-I.D.: esquire.141
Posted: Tue Aug  4 09:28:23 1987
Date-Received: Thu, 6-Aug-87 01:58:58 EDT
References: <3289@bigburd.PRC.Unisys.COM> <28700017@ccvaxa>
Reply-To: roger@esquire.UUCP (Roger Reid)
Organization: DP&W, New York, NY
Lines: 18

In article <28700017@ccvaxa> aglew@ccvaxa.UUCP writes:
>
>Here's a question of taste:
>
>	When you've completed an application nicely in C,
>	using functions everywhere, and it's still too slow,
>	which would you rather do?:
>
>	(1) Rewrite parts of it in assembler,
>
>     	or (2) Use gotos?



I'd rather find a  better algorithm than  pick up a nanosecond here and
there hacking in goto's.  

						Roger Reid