Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!husc6!cmcl2!brl-adm!brl-smoke!gwyn
From: gwyn@brl-smoke.ARPA (Doug Gwyn )
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Weird C code as test for employment
Message-ID: <6239@brl-smoke.ARPA>
Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 17:55:53 EDT
Article-I.D.: brl-smok.6239
Posted: Thu Aug  6 17:55:53 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 13:58:16 EDT
References: <8634@brl-adm.ARPA> <7881@mimsy.UUCP>
Reply-To: gwyn@brl.arpa (Doug Gwyn (VLD/VMB) <gwyn>)
Organization: Ballistic Research Lab (BRL), APG, MD.
Lines: 8

In article <7881@mimsy.UUCP> chris@mimsy.UUCP (Chris Torek) writes:
>*--*++cpp was not wrong; Doug obviously just looked at it and said
>`you gotta be kidding'.

No, actually I suspected it might be wrong and looked up the rules
for lvalueness in the latest X3J11 draft.  As a result of discussion
with Chris, however, I now think that the X3J11 rules may not be
what we intended, and I'll be bringing that up at the next meeting.