Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!linus!husc6!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbcad!ames!ptsfa!ihnp4!homxb!mhuxt!mhuxm!mhuxo!ulysses!faline!karn From: karn@faline.UUCP Newsgroups: sci.physics,sci.space,comp.lsi Subject: Re: Radiation effects on semiconductors Message-ID: <696@faline.bellcore.com> Date: Thu, 30-Jul-87 21:08:23 EDT Article-I.D.: faline.696 Posted: Thu Jul 30 21:08:23 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 1-Aug-87 16:32:34 EDT References: <1356@ssc-vax.UUCP> Organization: Bell Communications Research, Inc Lines: 31 Summary: yes, I'm interested Xref: linus sci.physics:1840 sci.space:2229 comp.lsi:188 Yes, I would find that an interesting discussion, for a very practical reason. AMSAT, the volunteer group that builds satellites for amateur radio communication, is facing this problem. We built and launched a satellite (Oscar-10) in 1983 aboard Ariane into an elliptical orbit (inclination 26 degrees, perigee 4000 km, apogee 35000 km). Oscar-10 carries an onboard computer and quite a bit of random CMOS logic. SSI logic is no problem; most RCA CD4000B series ICs are hard to a megarad. The microprocessor was the rad-hard Sandia version of the 1802. However, the Achilles heel was the 16K bytes of Mostek 4116 dynamic RAM (I know, I know, but it wasn't *my* idea...) At first, the memory performed fine; the (8,12) Hamming code error correcting hardware had no problem correcting the one or two soft errors that occurred on each orbit during passage of the inner Van Allen belt. However, less than 3 years later the memory hard-failed due to accumulated radiation damage. The next spacecraft in the series has been redesigned to use Harris HS-6564RH static CMOS memories which are claimed to function after 100 kilorad exposures. It will be aboard Ariane V21 (the first Ariane 4 launch) late this year or early 1988. While we hope we have solved our radiation susceptibility problems for the present spacecraft, it is pretty obvious to everybody that the 1802 is an outdated microprocessor. The 3-axis stabilized spacecraft now being designed for geostationary service will have much greater onboard computing requirements, so we are considering the Harris 80C86 microprocessor. (No, we do *not* plan to run MS-DOS on it!) Has this chip proven itself in radiation environments yet? How about larger, cheaper and/or faster rad-hard memory chips? Phil Karn, KA9Q Asst VP, AMSAT