Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!mtune!jhc From: jhc@mtune.ATT.COM (Jonathan Clark) Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp Subject: Re: dynamic routing for UUCP mail Message-ID: <1141@mtune.ATT.COM> Date: Wed, 12-Aug-87 21:29:29 EDT Article-I.D.: mtune.1141 Posted: Wed Aug 12 21:29:29 1987 Date-Received: Sat, 15-Aug-87 05:40:20 EDT References: <915@bsu-cs.UUCP> <13680@topaz.rutgers.edu> <4577@felix.UUCP> <10149@orchid.waterloo.edu> <2707@hoptoad.uucp> Reply-To: jhc@mtune.UUCP (Jonathan Clark) Distribution: na Organization: AT&T ISL Middletown NJ USA Lines: 44 In article <2707@hoptoad.uucp> gnu@hoptoad.uucp (John Gilmore) writes: :There are two optimizations that we should be able to safely make for :rerouting bang-path mail. (If I'm wrong, please post a polite correction.) : :(1) The uucp domain mail design was such that if a smart mailer : finds a path like foo!bar!a.b.c!anything, and it knows how to : get to a.b.c, it can throw away the foo!bar! part. Furthermore, : if there are multiple dotted addresses (e.g. foo!a.b.c!d.e.f!g), : it can take the rightmost one it knows. This is because domain : addresses are UNIQUE by design. (People who invent their own, : and put them on mail, deserve what they get.) I don't think that this poses any problems, in general, apart from the usual 'should I fiddle with a bang path?' question. I certainly agree with the last point! :(2) I've been planning to put in a rerouter here that just shortens : paths that go through sites ALL OF WHICH ARE KNOWN TO ME. That's : not to say that I have a link to them, but e.g. : ptsfa!ames!ihnp4!cbosgd!ncoast!allbery : can be cut down to ncoast!allbery because I have links to ptsfa, This is very close to something I've thought of putting into smail, the FAVOURED-HOST list. This would be a list of sites that my site is flat out guaranteed to be able to talk to (cbosgd, ihnp4, rutgers, codas, clyde and a couple of others in my world), and consequently I could do a rightmost scan until I hit a site I know, then short-circuit the lefthand part of the path. Useful for netnews paths! Comments, anyone? : ihnp4, and cbosgd, and can add "ames" to a short list of sites : that my neighbors talk to. Personally I think that's dangerous, quite apart from being unsure about exactly which "ames" the mail is going to go to. Given the number of mail and net neophytes around these days, the original sender very likely knows much less well than a properly maintained database how to *really* route hir mail. Earlier today I saw a pile of large articles in transit through this machine going to a site which I talk to at 9600 baud, but it was going via 2 1200-baud links. I let it go... -- Jonathan Clark [NAC,attmail]!mtune!jhc An Englishman never enjoys himself except for some noble purpose.