Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!rutgers!umnd-cs!umn-cs!smiller
From: smiller@umn-cs.UUCP (Steven M. Miller)
Newsgroups: comp.org.usenix
Subject: Re: UNIX Review considered sleazy
Message-ID: <2050@umn-cs.UUCP>
Date: Thu, 20-Aug-87 22:17:59 EDT
Article-I.D.: umn-cs.2050
Posted: Thu Aug 20 22:17:59 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 22-Aug-87 14:44:58 EDT
References: <1890@sfsup.UUCP>
Organization: University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
Lines: 28

In article <1890@sfsup.UUCP>, mdash@sfsup.UUCP (M.D.Scheer) writes:
> Now let's face it.  I don't really care whether I get the opportunity to
> read another attempt to explain C pointer and array semantics to the MIS
> managers of the world.  I'll live without the monthly thrill of UNIX
> Review's arrival.  ("I've been thrown out of better places than this.")
> But I >DID< take the time to fill out their questionnaire, and they >DID<
> imply that I would receive the magazine in return.

Have you ever read this magazine?  I've found it to be one of the best
non-journal computer rags available.   If you said the same about UNIX WORLD
I'd agree with your slam, but Unix Review is a quality magazine that
very consistently provides entire issues that cover a single topic in
depth with articles written by experts in the field.  Typically I find
only one or two articles worth reading in a magazine, while I've read
Unix Review from cover to cover many times.  

If you feel slighted simply give them a call and work out your frustrations
before dumping them on the net, please don't make accusations you cannot
support.




-- 



			-Steve Miller, U of MN