Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rochester!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!UXC.CSO.UIUC.EDU!sandrock
From: sandrock@UXC.CSO.UIUC.EDU (Mark Sandrock)
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IBM TCP.
Message-ID: <8708051624.AA26323@uxc.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: Wed, 5-Aug-87 12:24:18 EDT
Article-I.D.: uxc.8708051624.AA26323
Posted: Wed Aug  5 12:24:18 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 02:57:33 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 5


   It sounds like you are claiming that DEC preempts Ethernet hardware
   addresses which have been officially assigned to other vendors, but
   I have yet to see a specific example of such an address. Is it asking
   to much either to see an example or else have everyone drop this claim?