Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!CRNLNS.BITNET!SYSTEM
From: SYSTEM@CRNLNS.BITNET
Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip
Subject: Re: IBM TCP.
Message-ID: <8708061542.AA15402@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
Date: Thu, 6-Aug-87 11:37:00 EDT
Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8708061542.AA15402
Posted: Thu Aug  6 11:37:00 1987
Date-Received: Sat, 8-Aug-87 11:03:31 EDT
Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU
Distribution: world
Organization: The ARPA Internet
Lines: 22

Mark,

>   It sounds like you are claiming that DEC preempts Ethernet hardware
>   addresses which have been officially assigned to other vendors, but
>   I have yet to see a specific example of such an address. Is it asking
>   to much either to see an example or else have everyone drop this claim?

Herewith the DECnet Ethernet address for node 19.53, aka 19509::

AA-00-03-01-10-E7

I do not know if this conflicts with any other vendor's address
assignments.

Selden E. Ball, Jr.
(Wilson Lab's network and system manager)

Cornell University                 NYNEX: +1-607-255-0688
Laboratory of Nuclear Studies     BITNET: SYSTEM@CRNLNS
Wilson Synchrotron Lab              ARPA: SYSTEM%CRNLNS.BITNET@WISCVM.WISC.EDU
Judd Falls & Dryden Road          PHYSnet/HEPnet/SPAN:
Ithaca, NY, USA  14853             LNS61::SYSTEM = 44283::SYSTEM (node 43.251)