Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!husc6!cmcl2!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!TAUNIVM.BITNET!HANK From: HANK@TAUNIVM.BITNET (Hank Nussbacher) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip Subject: VMS and X.25 Message-ID: <8708101644.AA04454@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> Date: Mon, 10-Aug-87 13:17:55 EDT Article-I.D.: ucbvax.8708101644.AA04454 Posted: Mon Aug 10 13:17:55 1987 Date-Received: Tue, 11-Aug-87 04:39:07 EDT Sender: daemon@ucbvax.BERKELEY.EDU Reply-To: Hank Nussbacher Distribution: world Organization: The ARPA Internet Lines: 15 I have been looking at various VMS and microVMS solutions for Tcp/Ip (Excelan, Interlan-Micom, Wollongong, SRI, Hyperlink, etc.) and all of them assume an Ethernet. How do sites connect lone VMS systems that are geographically scattered over many kilometers? The expensive solution is to build a 1 meter Ethernet, buy a bridge and connect that way. Do any of these systems handle X.25? What h/w do you need to buy? Will the Excelan and Interlan solutions work with an X.25 card or can an X.25 solution only be handled by a strictly software implementation (like Wollongong or Hyperlink)? Is there a way to do it with a leased line without Ethernet or a bridge? Thanks, Hank P.S. Plz send all replies directly to me.