Relay-Version: version B 2.10 5/3/83; site utzoo.UUCP
Path: utzoo!mnetor!uunet!seismo!rutgers!ucla-cs!zen!ucbvax!ulysses!hector!jss
From: jss@hector..UUCP (Jerry Schwarz)
Newsgroups: comp.std.internat,sci.lang
Subject: Re: English digraphs, diacritiacl marks
Message-ID: <2842@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com>
Date: Fri, 21-Aug-87 16:45:08 EDT
Article-I.D.: ulysses.2842
Posted: Fri Aug 21 16:45:08 1987
Date-Received: Sun, 23-Aug-87 03:32:57 EDT
References: <8708171253.AA21033@ephemeral.ai.toronto.edu> <2237@zeus.TEK.COM>
Sender: daemon@ulysses.homer.nj.att.com
Reply-To: jss@hector (Jerry Schwarz)
Organization: AT&T Bell Labs, Murray Hill
Lines: 17
Xref: mnetor comp.std.internat:140 sci.lang:1186

Jean-Francois Lamy writes:
>
>Just by curiosity, a quick scan of my brain seems to indicate that English
>would be the only European language not to use diacritical marks, digraphs,
>or extra letters. (? - I mean something like the dutch "ij").


I quote from a draft of the Rationale of the proposed 
ANSI C standard, section 4.4:

	The English language uses 26 letters derived from the
	Latin alphabet. The set of letters suffices for English, 
	Swahili, and Hawaiian; all other living languages use
	either the Latin aphabet plus other characters, or other 
	non Latin aphabets or syllabaries.

They cite no reference for this piece of trivia.